I have a passion for the most
boring subject on earth: Finance. But
what really gets me going is the systemic failure of the United States’ financial
system. Just by looking beyond the walls of Trinity’s campus, we can see how
the financial system in this country has failed to benefit the majority of
Americas.
I think that one
of the biggest reasons for the perversion of the financial sector is that
finance and politics in the United States are engaged in a very dangerous
relationship. Since 1979, there has been
stagnation in the wage growth of poor and middle-income earners, leading to a
shrinking percentage of total wealth controlled as the economy grows. On the
other hand, those who have incomes in the top 10%, and especially those in the
top 1%, have seen their share of the wealth pie grow substantially. The
financial system has essentially been used to funnel wealth from those in
society who need it most to those who need it the least.
This most recent
corruption of the financial center is due largely to the crusade of
deregulation. Before Reagan, regulation was viewed as an area for policy wonks
to argue over the minutia of their respective areas, but Reagan made
deregulation about morality. He saw, and convinced a sizable amount of the
American people, that regulation was inherently bad, and both Republicans and
Democrats have carried this sentiment to the present. In a recent blog post on
the website Baseline Scenario, frequent contributor and author of 13 Bankers, James Kwak had this to say
about morality politics and their influence on the financial sector:
“…For
Rick Perry and people like him, there’s something immoral and unmanly about
inflation and about paper money. He can stand there telling people that
monetary expansion is devaluing the dollars in their pockets, and those people
will nod their heads, even though (a) it isn’t—check the inflation figures—and
(b) many of them are net debtors and thus stand to gain from a
little more inflation. The basic problem is that Rick Perry and his audience
(and probably many other people) see economic questions in primarily moral
terms, and in their moral universe gold is better than paper and deflation is
better than inflation. (That’s the obvious inference if you say that inflation
is bad.)”
This passage clearly explains the relationship
between modern morality politics and the financial sector. The people who stand
to gain the most from increased inflation, the poor, have been led to believe
in a position that hurts them economically. However, this is no accident. The
people that have distorted the financial sector, so that it acts to transfer
wealth to the wealthy, are also the people who endorse this line of reasoning
because they are net creditors. When people see inflation targets and
regulation as moral questions it clouds their judgment. When you ask someone in
favor of deregulation whether we should deregulate industry, the answer is
generally “yes”. This is because in the minds of many people regulation and
interest rates are seen as a moral question rather than an economic one. People
should have opinions, it encourages participation in our society, but they
should think critically about the opinions they hold instead of being
conditioned to respond in a certain way to the words “regulation” and
deregulation. The financial system is in a world of trouble and it is up to the
American people to make sure it gets fixed.
No comments:
Post a Comment